Menu

+ Home Page

+ Books
+ Essays
+ Art
+ Anti-DRM
+ Promise to the Public
+ Free Software
+ Recommended Software
+ Contact Me
+ Bio
+ Awards


Causes

Windows7Sins.org

Eliminate DRM!
Protect your freedom!

End Software Patents

No Microsoft OpenXML

Focus Fusion Society
Safe Energy Source for the Future

©Copyright 2006-2009, Pedro M. Rosario Barbosa
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.
Underdetermination of Science Project
Local Menu:
|
UOS HomeAbout UOS | References | Copyright | Related Links | Read and Download | Donate or Buy | GraphicsPublisher |

Copyright

Recently I made a promise to the public, which included placing my books under the Founder's Copyright.  And as promised, I made Underdetermination of Science - Part I: The Relation Between Formal Science and Natural Science be under the Founder's Copyright.   What does this mean?  It means that I do not own my book's Copyright, instead Creative Commons Corporation is the owner.  Why would I sell for $1.00 my Copyright to Creative Commons?  Very simple. Creative Commons and I have entered into an agreement which basically states the following:
  1. I sold my Copyright to Creative Commons Corporation for the price of $1.00.

  2. Creative Commons Corporation will grant me an exclusive license, even with respect to Creative Commons, to publish and profit from my work.  It will be up to me to determine how my work will be licensed, how it will be distributed and sold either in bookstores or online.

  3. I will have this exclusive license for a period of 14 years, which can be renewed for another 14 years.

  4. After the license expires, the contract stipulates that my work will enter into the public domain.
Like all of Creative Commons licenses, the Founder's Copyright is a hack to Copyright Law.  I do not believe that anyone should have a Copyright on their work for a lifetime plus seventy years.  First, the purpose of Copyright is not to be intellectual property (as many people claim), but to be an incentive for the creation of works.  However, since books are important cultural means to provide knowledge to the public, it is important that they have access to knowledge.  It is the destiny of all commercial cultural works to place them in the public domain.  I know that maybe 30 to 50 years of Copyright can be reasonable, but no longer than 50 years.  Today we have a lot of valuable works which could be now available on the Internet, and yet they are not, because they are trapped by Copyright Law, which has extended the Copyright to an absurdly long period of time.  More than 90% of old copyrighted works are not circulating, nor are being published, nor are they producing money to any companies and authors.  These works could have been in the public domain providing knowledge, art, and music to the public.

To avoid this, I look at the original Copyright laws approved by the U.S. Congress:  the first copyright law approved by the United States which granted 14 years of Copyright to the authors, which could be extended by another 14 years if requested by the authors, and then the work enters into the public domain.


Powered by Ubuntu      Document made with KompoZer      Powered by GNU      Hacker Emblem     Creative Commons Network
Graphics by GIMP     [FSF Associate Member]     Electric Cars     Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional