Author: Pedro M. Rosario Barbosa
Copyright: 2008, Creative Commons Corporation
|
Underdetermination of Science:
Part I
The Relation Between
Formal
Science and Natural Science
by
Pedro M.
Rosario Barbosa
This
book is the first of a series of books on the subject of
underdetermination or subdetermination of science. A particular
view of scientific theories pertaining to this subject has become
popular since the publication of Willard Van Orman Quine's "Two Dogmas
of Empiricism". According to it, formal sciences such as logic
and mathematics can be revised in light of recalcitrant experience.
This
book states that only a platonist view of mathematics can account for
the real relationship between formal science and natural science.
For platonism to be a viable option, a particular philosophical
doctrine is endorsed, namely that of Edmund Husserl. If we regard
mathematical entities as formal-ontological categories and mathematics
as a mathesis universalis, we
are able to hold a platonist proposal that agrees with contemporary
mathematics and provides an adequate mathematical epistemology.
Once the nature and epistemology of mathematics is understood, we
can understand better why experience cannot revise logic and
mathematics. |